- wow...the times are tight...one minute to respond, 45 seconds for rebuttal...hope they ate their wheaties...
- Question 1 - negative ads
- merkley responds to question about negative ads...kind of a weasely answer
- wow, smith brings up his wife's feelings...that's a pretty tough statement.
- smith offers to bring down his ads.
- merkley plays the rove card
- smith calls merkley ads defamatory, etc.
- this is getting pretty personal and snipy, right of the bat...
- Question 2 - Bailout bill
- Smith - talks about doing something vs doing nothing....seems to be a strong answer
- Merkley - talks about smith raising taxes, and also cutting taxes for the rich. This seems like a tricky and strange argument. I don't think it works.
- Smith - you have a choice to believe what he's said, or what he's done. Smith says he is a rural oregonian, and knows what they need. Says merkley has taxed, snubbed rural oregon. This is a very strong argument.
- Smith - we need to stabilize the monster that is wall street before it gets to your street...good line.
- This monster has many fathers and a long tail....
- Merkley - meltdown on wall street is a consequence of bush-smith. de-regulation, let the bankers do what they want. bailout is a 700 billion dollar blank check to wall street. This is just untrue, hope Smith responds.
- Smith - you fix it by stabilizing things, then modernizing regulatory system.
- Smith - we have to unfreeze the credit market
- Merkley - end the practice of subprime loans
- Merkley - problem is due to bush-smith (blah blah blah)
- Merkley - speaks briefly on smaller things, then pivots to Iraq (was this a disagreement with your party?)
- smith - state house resolution to praise bush, ask for removal of saddam, says merkley voted yes.
Comments