Skip to main content

Jeff Merkley thinks any government program that employs someone is worth doing

This from Jeff Merkley in the Huffington Post today:

Whether it's logging to reduce wildfire hazards, teaching children, laying new light rail tracks, or preventing floods along the Mississippi, people will be paid to do these jobs - that's not wasteful spending, that's the whole point.

Sooooo...let me get this straight. If it's a government program and it employs someone, it "creates jobs". This has got to be the most expensive economic philosophy in existence.

The point of a stimulus plan, obviously, is to stimulate the economy (in other words, business) such that businesses flourish and there are lots of new jobs. Although some programs involving employing more government employees might be laudable, and in theory some of these programs might be stimulative to the economy, it''s clear that the job provided by a salary paid for directly from the stimulus is hardly a job "created".

My bottom line on the stimulus plan:
I think Democrats should take a much closer look at this spending bill...because even if they get a few Republicans to vote for it, it clearly is their bill. As Ross Douthat points out, plenty of Democrats voted for the Iraq war, but it still became a millstone around the neck of virtually every Republican. If this bill doesn't work (get the economy moving again), Democrats will be very, very damaged. So if I were them, I'd make sure they listen to the blue dogs.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

John McCain and George H.W. Bush...Separated at Birth?

...have you noticed the similarities (I know they're not identical) between the candidacies of John McCain and George H.W. Bush? Both men: were decorated military veterans had lost nomination fights in the past had extensiive foreign policy resumes criticized for being less interested in domestic politics criticized for being a moderate, not being conservative enough. True enough...McCain and George HW...seperated at birth.
1 comment
Read more

NW Republican: Ronald Reagan was more than an actor

This is a GREAT post in NW Republican: NW Republican: Ronald Reagan was more than an actor He is basically making the point that I've made...that while I agree with Christine O'Donnell on points of policy, she was a terrible candidate. We mock Joe Biden for being prone to gaffes, but she was almost as prone to it as he is. We mocked Barack Obama for being unqualified to be President, but what are her qualifications? What has she actually done ? We need to get to a point where someone needs to actually be a good candidate with significant life achievements, not just have the right views and look good on TV. The ones who fit that bill in the last election (Pat Toomey, Marco Rubio, John Kasich, Rob Portman are examples) won. Here is a link to the original column by Peggy Noonan that he refers to in his blog post: "Americans Vote for Maturity", by Peggy Noonan, WSJ, 11-5-2010
Post a Comment
Read more

Michael Steele delivers GOP weekly address

Here is Michael Steele delivering the weekly Republican address: Transcript: This is Michael Steele, Chairman of the Republican National Committee. Democrats have controlled both branches of government for less than a month. And you have to wonder if all that power has gone to their heads. For the last two weeks, they've been trying to force a massive spending bill through Congress under the guise of economic relief. All of us - Republicans and Democrats - agree the government must act to kick-start the American economy. American families are doing their best to balance their own budgets and pay their mortgages. The fastest way to help those families is by letting them keep more of the money they earn. Individual empowerment: that's how you stimulate the economy. But the Democrats have a different philosophy. Instead of leaving money in the family checkbook, they want to send it to Washington, run it through a slow and inefficient government, and hope that does some good. Wh...
Post a Comment
Read more